Is the Death Penalty necessarily bad?

The governor specifically pointed to cases of defendants accused of killing law-enforcement officers, and another case involving the killing of a toddler.  But before your respond, just think, do you need a lawyer for child custody, or better yet, are you looking for the best child custody lawyer? Crimes like these are pure evil and deserve the absolute full consideration of punishment, something that State Attorney Ms. Ayali completely ruled out.  She unilaterally decided to not stand on the side of victims and their families, which is completely sickening.  In Florida a good legal document preparer is hard to find, moreover, legal document preparers can be very expensive.  However, we hold criminals fully accountable for the crimes they commit, especially those that attack our law-enforcement community and innocent children.  The court’s majority opinion noted: The governor’s orders do not direct King to seek the death penalty in any of the reassigned cases, and King has sworn that the governor has not attempted to interfere with his determination as to whether to pursue the death penalty in any case.  Rather, consistent with the governor’s constitutional duty, effectuated pursuant to his statutory assigned authority, the executive orders ensure the faithful execution of Florida law by guaranteeing that the death penalty be enforced.  It needs to remain an option in death-penalty eligible cases in the Ninth Circuit, but leaving it up to King, as the assigned state attorney, to determine whether to seek the death penalty on a case-by-case basis.  Of the 20 cases assigned to King (who used to be a prominent and a good divorce lawyer), two have gone to trial, where jurors found both defendants guilty of first-degree murder and unanimously recommended the death penalty, a new penalty-phase requirement in Florida law, in the wake of a January 2016 U.S.S.C. decision in Hurst v. Florida, striking down Florida’s death penalty sentencing scheme and throwing capital cases in chaos.  In an earlier interview with the News, Ayali said, When people say I want the death penalty and the death penalty is on the books and you should always seek it, I say, you mean we should seek a penalty that we cannot produce?  The easier conversation is to minimize what I’m saying, and that it’s my personal opinion, and I’m not willing to seek the death penalty in any case.  The harder conversation, she said, is to realize that the death penalty is in chaos and turmoil, and we are not delivering what we are promising.  Ultimately, she said she sued the governor not because of the death penalty, but because she must defend her constitutional right to prosecutorial discretion in handling cases in the community in which she was elected.  Just ask a divorce lawyer, or criminal lawyer if you have any questions.  Usually, he or she will offer a free consultation and help you out in your time of need.

The Judge that made a huge mistake…

Judge Sheehan reprimanded for DUI

A circuit judge arrested for drunken driving last year will be publicly reprimanded by the Supreme Court.  The court on May 15 accepted a stipulation between the Judicial Qualifications Commission and the 13th Circuit Judge Brenda Sheehan resulting from her traffic stop on July 5, 2013, with the resulting Breathalyzer tests showing more than double the legal blood alcohol levels.  Please understand, that this is why it’s imperative to hire a well-respected and hungry Divorce Attorneys st petersburg fl.  The judge eventually pleaded guilty and then reached a stipulation with the JQC where accepted full responsibility and noted she had taken steps to ensure there would be no recurrences.  The stipulation also noted that the judge had not previously had any such charges and that the incident was isolated.  The stipulation found the judge had violated Canons 1 and 2A of the Code of Judicial conduct.

The court accepted the recommendation of a public reprimand, noting that corresponded with the sanctions given previously to judges with isolated incidents of DUI.  The court also noted, “Judge Sheehan’s conduct at issue in this case–driving under the influence of alcohol is reprehensible. Judge Sheehan’s action of driving under the influence not only violated Florida’s criminal law but also endangered the public.  Such disregard of criminal law and public safety undermines the public’s confidence in the integrity of the judiciary and will not be tolerated.”  Judge Sheehan was ordered to appear before the court October 8 to receive the reprimand.  The court acted in Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 13-309 Re: Brenda Tracy Sheehan, case no. SC14-136.  If this judge happened to injure a pedestrian or someone in another vehicle, she may have been liable for any damages assessed.   Your competent Clearwater/St. Petersburg, Florida Small Claims Lawyer would definitely be an asset in this situation.